Lego's AI Revolution + SpaceX 42K Satellites Approved MCA9

Welcome to Morpheus Cyber. Before our live host, DiveIn, here's what's coming up and how you can join the conversation. Head to ahaslides.com slash MCA9 to vote in live polls, ask questions, and interact with today's show. It's free and anonymous. Today's episode, Lego AI, SpaceX Iran, healthcare AI showdown. First up, Lego Smart Break 50-year evolution, Toys Meet Tech Intelligence. Then, SpaceX 700 satellite, okay, and it rounds revolution. Orbital traffic jam ahead followed by AI healthcare showdown, open AI launches versus Google retreats. Dr. Chatbot ready. And finally, AI models learning by asking themselves questions, machines teaching themselves. Listening on Apple podcasts or Spotify, you can still join at ahaslides.com slash MCA9. All right, let's get into it. You know, on a podcast has made me a little bit smarter. I'm having to go out and do a lot of my own research, which I enjoy that a lot. And yeah, today's segment was going to be good. Gus, you got to say hi to everybody first before we get in. I think I think it made me dumber. I realize I'm little I know. Oh, it's good. Welcome everyone and thanks for tuning in. Yeah, there's just too much to know. So we try to pick at least four, four subjects every week that are interesting. We feel they're interesting. We hope you feel they're interesting. So first topic that Bill was talking about was the Lego smart brick, which is a new 50 year evolution of their product. How many people have not all of us have probably had Legos in our home. For if you haven't had a Lego, you're not, you're an alien. You're not of this earth. Yeah, all of my children have gone through Legos. My grandchildren have got those handed down to them. So we get buckets and loads of Legos that they can build with. And it's no longer where's the instructions to build something anymore. It's what can you build that's unique on your own? So I think Legos are one of the best toys ever. And they've been around forever. I can't even remember how long says 50 years pretty much. It's been around since 1958. Yeah. So about as long as we've been alive. Gus, have you ever stepped on a Lego that your kids left out? Bill, I have girls. So I stepped on a lot of Barbie. Barbies. Yeah, I had one girl. Two boys. Yeah, we had probably 10,000 Barbies. They were in the bath tub. In everywhere. No Legos. What about my little ponies? Come on. Yeah. All the girls that had that. You had a lot of girls doing so how many girls did you have total? Four. Four girls. Yeah. And I just added another one. And I have two granddaughters and two grandsons. Yeah. Yeah. That's awesome. Yeah. And Gus is a new grandfather too. That I am. I got a picture this week of this baby. And the baby had a full head of hair. It was crazy. Yeah. It was awesome. He's very cute. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. He was born with full head of hair. My daughter Audrey was born with full head of hair. And it's just, I guess, the way it works. Usually they look like a crumpled up a raisin with some eyeballs. This kid looks a little bit like Elvis. I got to say. So, wait, anyway, we're talking about Legos. Yeah. That's wrong legos set on that. That was my ReadyNe success. Okay, great. Thank you. Was it on public advice we wouldn't do as long as? I'm gonna ask any of those little de A. They were trying to make a bunch of repeated models of musicals fixed by other people. So what I have to say is, because Episodes are preoccupied with all the new albums andestials, and for the new titles that took place today, some of the most responsible added songs produced in terms of the original 소眾 highlight.木木唱 team what they're going to perform today andTakegah to cover things. I pressed that ISO to play out playing panda music. They had a music video called The Ghost covering. Some of us was already speaking. They said, something hard to see. It's because of the smart belki at the CES, that thought it was cool. I like Legos as a whole never been to Lego land though. I don't know. I've been to Lego land. Hey, Jim, do you remember in Las Vegas when there used to be Comdex and then interop in that world? And yeah, they did the same sort of thing. And yeah, it was all over the city. This is the biggest, I think. Yeah, pretty cool show. Sunday, I'll get there. What's the other auto show that they have there? I like that one too. I'd never been to that. But anyhow, it doesn't matter. Seema. That's what it was a Seema show. Anyway, so when I heard about this thing, I said, okay, so it's a smart brick. What is a smart brick do? So I looked into the bit and I watched a few of you. It goes on it because I'm interested in how they're working. What are they cost and all that? They're brand new, Jim. So you couldn't have very much experience. I think they just got announced, right? So I don't think you can buy them yet. They're advertising the price. I don't know. And they have kits. So I think they are available. And that's the only way you can get the smart bricks. You can't buy them separately because they're part of a kit where you get a smart brick and an NFS control device, which is part this programmatic break. So the way these things work is by using what is it NF NFC's NFC's which are called near field communications devices. And those are similar to smartphones using tamicards used down ID badges, use them smart locks and access code cards that when you put them over a reader, then it opens the lock. That kind of thing. Those little chips that are on your something like a code to. I'll leave it in. And it totally, guys, I'll just tell you, I visited a new church this past couple of weeks. And they have those NFC, they have a little round disk. And instead of all the written paraphernalia and everything, it says, okay, now if you want to take sermon notes, just tap your phone right here. And if you want to hit everything. And basically they change where that tap goes to based upon what the leader is talking about. Pretty interesting. They, Wager was kind of using that technology. And inside of the smart brick, we have this capability of this little smart ship that's inside of it to do things along with an LED, so it'll light up a little speaker in it. So it makes noises. So everything's in this one little block. And it's the same size as a regular Lego block. So it's not, oh, this is a special different kind of block. It looks just like a regular Lego block, but it's semi transparent. So that when the light, the LED comes on, you can see the light come through it like and it has the ability to change colors and all that stuff. And so every time it comes near an NFC, which is embedded on another part in the Lego, the Lego project or kit that you buy, it, it makes the noise or does the action that the NFC has already embedded on it. So it's a program sitting there. And when the block comes near it, it's activated just like when you put your smart card down, something happens, right? The same thing with the little block when it comes anywhere near the NFC device, which is on one of the Lego parts, it either lights up or does a sound like a lightsaber sound or it flashes or does a police signal siren or something, whatever it is. But the first kids they put out are Star Wars type of kits. Yeah, there's three kids that they've got coming out. And it's interesting because you can play with, they're just like they're plug and play with regular legus. So you can build all these different things and you can add the smart bricks where, where appropriate, which is cool. And it's a good step forward, I think, from kids, you know, looking at YouTube, scrolling through different things, watching videos. This is actually a kinesthetic operation that children can sit down and interact with technology in a, in more of a positive way actually, because it's got smart reactions. And the cars, you know, what kid you get the Tonka truck truck, right? And you drive it around. But that Tonka truck, truck doesn't make noises, doesn't turn on things necessarily. And now we're going to have these toys that basically excite children to be more kinesthetic, to not be on a phone, not be in another world, and be in an external world, and encourage the physical world of all these experiments. I, I spoke at a, at a deal here in Texas this last year, where the computer science department and the, the, basically the state of Texas said, look, we need to get kids into STEM, we need to get them into basically computer science and that sort of thing. They had a big lab. And the big lab had some of these sort of weird, just completely outlandish, not just Lego, but a lot of different things. And they're trying to bring kinesthetic and learning into the electronic world that we're in. And this is a good step forward, I think that I'm going to get one, just because I think take it to a trade show or if I'm speaking somewhere, I can go pull two Legos out. And what happens when you put this Lego with that Lego? And here's a Star Wars thing. And yeah, it's cool. The one thing about Legos, we'll go ahead. Okay. Well, just help me out with this because I already said that Legos aren't a big part of my life. And I understand that toy sales are down and electronic type toys are the future. I get why Lego has done this, but I don't know what this is. I don't quite get what they do. If you put a computer into a car, it drives itself. And I get it. Okay, you put this computer that supposedly is the same processing power as the Apollo 13. And if I ever heard that analogy again, I'm going to throw up. But nonetheless, it's pretty amazing into this little Lego brick. Yeah. So what? I mean, okay. Let me paint a picture for you. So it comes with, right now it comes with a particular Star Wars type of maybe an X-wing fighter. And so when you lift it up and you move it, it feels the motion and the engines will make noise off of that. It's got an accelerometer in it, Gus. And I've saw another one where you can use this thing. If you blow on it, it plays the song Happy Birthday. So there's a lot of things that you can do with this thing that kids can play around with. So now let's say they get the X-wing kit, but they decide, I don't want to have an X-wing. I want to make my own. That's what's this is the power of a Lego is that even though Lego comes with a kit and it has instructions and you build the thing, every kid in the world wants to go afterwards and go, I want to change this. I want to make more wings. I want to have two people sitting in the costume. I want that you can do all these things. And that's what is the value of Lego's because creativity is now inspired. So you can do whatever you want to do with Legos, even though you started with a fundamental, there's plan that it came with is the schematic that showed you how to put it together. Now you can say, I can alter this schematic. I can do what I want it to do with it. And that's what little boys like. So bridges the gap from the traditional toys, but it satisfies the urge for cool things that make noises and stuff, but still the creative task of building something in Legos clearly is good for a child's development. And that's the point. And it is, it's been played for hours with Legos. My two boys, I was so glad for Legos. I was so happy. And so he gets otherwise, I would have to do a lot of things with a played with the Legos to with them. Because it was, it's even fun for an adult to create things too and help them think about it, build a castle and then have two wars between two brothers, things like that. Because they got a little army men, the little army men, the green army. So they used their Legos to build their fortress and then they put their little army men out and they throw the Legos at the army men until they knock them over. Each time you knocked one over, you was dead. As they played all those kind of games. But that's just from imagination. They made them the other thing is that the accelerometer and I don't know all the features of them, but I know that the accelerometer can tell you if it's upside down, if it's sideways. So it senses a lot of different things and then it turns red, yellow, green and different colors. Now it said it came with a charger. So evidently, you don't put batteries in these Legos, no, no, they were illicitly charged. They have a small battery in it. They were illicitly charged. It takes about two hours to get them fully charged. And then from two hours of charging, you can get 45 minutes of continuous operation. Charge at once. Multiple, they all can be charged. That's cool. I get it. That's cool. I don't know that it's life changing. Gus, Jim and I might be buying one for your grandson just despite your reticence too. They're expensive. They are expensive. Of the three kits that are out, the first, the smallest kit is $69 and you get one smart brick and one smart tag and a charger. That's it. So it can only do this one thing. So the second one has called Luke's red five X-wing is $89.99. You get one smart red and multiple smart tags. So it can do multiple things. And then the biggest one, the most expensive one is $159.99 and it has two smart bricks and a bunch more tags. And they have some learning things for schools and stuff like that that are more expensive with larger kits. But have you ever given your spouse or your girlfriend, Gus, have you ever given your girlfriend one of those Lego bouquet flower bouquets? No, sir. I would be in big trouble if I did that. I baited you. Yeah, no, sir. But imagine if you had one of those flowers and she moved the flowers a little bit and has said, I love you so much type of thing. Every time she moved the flowers because the accelerometer is going to go off, right? Those are the sort of weird bizarre things that we're going to be able to do with those programmatically, right? I wish them the best of luck. Well, any of these kind of new toys traditionally in the past have all been connected to the internet in some way and people were saying, isn't that right or privacy or they are pulling information, that kind of thing. I looked at the product and that's not the case. It all runs locally. You have full control as to what information that it'll even allow it to be uploaded when it does get its update. So the NFC tags don't collect any play to hit a smart bricks don't upload any data on their own. And it's not connected in real time at all. The only thing you do is they have downloads for firmware upgrades and stuff of that nature, which apparent does the child doesn't do that. Correct. Yeah, so it's mostly for their smart place software that gets updated. But yeah, nothing's collected. So it's pretty safe. So as a security person, I'm doing. Well, that's good. At least they thought about that. Yeah, very much. Good design. Safe for people to use. But pricey as usual. But if you've been a lot of Lego person, all these years, it's a lot of money. Oh, hundreds of dollars worth of Lego boxes and boxes of them, right? Yeah. Starting with duplicos, the big ones, right? Yeah. Yeah. Under five. Yeah. Under five or another. Another world. So let's transition. Who's going to take the next segment? I can start it or did. Yeah, I can start it. We were kind of looking at this thing of a SpaceX being awarded this ability to just put 7,500 more satellites out in space. And we thought we didn't hit the news for him. So nobody's made a big deal about 7,500 more going out there. Starlink. They have a thousand four hundred now, Jim. I know. It's almost. Yeah. If SpaceX deploys everything that they're now authorized to launch, we're talking over 42,000 satellites in space. Amazon just now is trying to compete. And they are just now starting to launch their satellites. And their whole plan is only 3,200 satellites. So that SpaceX has got 40 going to have 42,000 of them. But when it's out there, that's something to think about. And they're going direct to cell phone because they bought that spectrum last year that allows them from a cell provider. They bought a cellular spectrum. And they're going to be able to go direct to cell phone in places. So you'll be able to. Is that Amazon? No, Elon. Okay. Elon, this is SpaceX. So you can pick up your phone in the remote as part of, let's say, Zimbabwe, pick up your phone. It's going to go up to the satellite. The satellites are going to relay it over. And you can have near very low latency communications with somebody anywhere else in the world. It's going to be pretty, pretty wild. Yeah. And it's pretty much what you call planetary infrastructure for the entire world, right? It's just going to be amazing that SpaceX has that kind of coverage. And now it's not just consumers like us, but entire governments that are going to depend on that infrastructure around the world, places that don't have in ground infrastructure. It's going to be easy for them to depend on this. So now SpaceX becomes highly dependent along by a particular government or nation for that matter, right? So it's someone to think about. What's the Iran connection? The reason we mentioned the thing about Iran is that the fact that whenever there's a revolution, the first thing that tyrannical governments do is shut down communications. So the existing internet service that they have is terrestrial. They shut that down. They completely don't allow you to get out because they don't want people to know what's going on in Iran. But with Elon Musk providing the starling satellites, and from what I hear hundreds of them have been thousands of them have been smuggled in to Iran against the law to have it, but they've smuggled them in. And that's how we're getting this live video feed. Because otherwise there's no way to get it out. And even with the government going after the satellite spectrum that starlink runs on, they're still able to get 20% upload in most cases because they can't completely stop it. What they do is they have signal interference to the point where they lose a lot of the throughput. That's a good thing. And most of our communication systems now as a protocol guy, you have these things where if it's halfway uploaded and it gets interrupted for a certain period of time, it will retry at the place. So it doesn't have to start from ground zero like we did in the olden days with bulletin board systems and stuff like that. So you can just resume where you were. And that lowers the amount of data going back and forth and that sort of thing. So yeah, I guess they're doing basically electronic warfare against these things by trying to jam the signals that we're using. And they're also trying because the system requires GPS to know where it is located so that it knows which lower orbit it satellites talking to. And so they're jamming their GPS signals and they're jamming the frequencies that starlink users. But I think it's a lost cause. They did it in Tehran. So you drive 20 miles out of town and upload your data, right? They can't do it for the whole country. That's a good truth. But they've begun trying, they have begun trying to hunt down these individual terminal and these users so that they can crack down on them taking them away from. I wouldn't imagine what kind of punishment they get after that. But the government's trying to round them up so they're using these signal detections to be asable to isolate where the signals are coming from and then take those terminals away from the users. Interesting. It reminds me of World War II when you had all these spies and they had the Morris code boxes and real radios and they would try to intercept those and all top secret. It's the modern day version of that. Yeah. Aside from the positive things that help country like Iran when they're in revolt and revolution, this is good. That's a good thing. The downside or possible thing that we need to just be considerate of is that one company now is going to control the world's infrastructure that's dominant. The most dominant world infrastructure that more than likely many countries are going to depend upon. And I don't know that's good or bad. I think the good side is great. This is what we say every week right every week, every topic we talk about. Who's in control? Who's making the decisions and ultimately is for to better the world or does it have the potential to somehow harm us? So it's the same problem with everything we talked about and we have to trust that. And we hope that always that Elon's organization will always be trustworthy and moral in the decisions that they make. Now interestingly, talk about ubiquitous. Do you realize that Starlink is going to have more satellites than McDonald's has restaurants? There's about 40,000 McDonald restaurants worldwide and star space X is going to have more satellites than McDonald's. Has locations. So put that in your pipe and smoke it right? You can't drive down the freeway and every exit has almost it seems has a McDonald's. So there you go. In every country, I've eaten McDonald's and I think I've been to 27 countries, 27 or 29 countries and I think I've eaten McDonald's in every stinking one. Why did I eat McDonald's in every stinking one? Because I'm an American and when you're out of the country, there's two places I go to eat when I go international. One is obviously McDonald's or something of that nature, just because it's kind of like home. And the other one is Chinese food. So I love Chinese food and whether I'm in Germany or it doesn't matter, I rack, I ran, I'm going to have some Chinese food and I always judge countries by how good their Chinese food is. Pretty much it does change a bit in every country but it's pretty similar. Now McDonald's changes a lot. They have different products in every country. Yeah, it's even in Hawaii. Yep. Yep. Do you see, you can get the spam burger there in Hawaii? Yeah, I have and I used to live in Hawaii and the funny thing is that you know the word mahalo. You're familiar with that if you go to home means thank you. On the garbage cans in McDonald's it says mahalo. So when I first heard, I thought they were referring to garbage. That was my first introduction and that McDonald's and it says mahalo on it. Okay, mahalo means garbage cans. I'm a quick learner. I also heard something that blew me away and that is the speed at which these things orbit the earth. You guys have any idea? It takes to do it for a trip. Tell us about it. 90 freaking minutes. As I say that, I don't even believe it. 90 minutes for what? To orbit. It goes to 17,000 miles an hour. So that just changed these things. They're whipping and there are only a couple hundred miles up. These close ones. You say they have the low latency. I don't know. I just incomprehensible that they could go around the earth in 90 minutes. Crazy. And they must have hand off to the other satellites for the communication. I don't know. It's a little overwhelming. Well, it's a mesh. So it's just a mesh sensor basically just constantly just receiving signals up if a request for connection. So yeah, it's just a mesh, big mesh. I saw a rendering of what it looks like from if you're outside looking at the earth and how many satellites it is, it's ridiculous how many there are. Eventually, it's going to impede our view of the sky at some point because this is not going to stop because you think the China is not going to try to put a bunch up there. You don't think Russia is not going to put a bunch up there. Every country in the world is going to want to be able to put them up there. They have a spaceship where they can lease or rent on it or rent time on a spaceship. That's basically what Amazon's doing. They got 38 flights that they've already paid for and they didn't ask Elon muster do any of them. It's all these other big and a veal on my pocket and flights. He just rescued the space station folks who were sick and they just landed and all's good. Yeah. Well, so Peter, Peter, Peter, we need to do Peter, the Amanda's Peter, the Amanda's who does the moon shots podcast mentioned in his podcast that we'll see 100 gigawatts per year of solar powered AI satellites in orbit. So they're already planning it. It's already starting in these satellites that the other satellites are going to need communications, right? A director otherwise because when they're spinning around the world, if you only have one satellite of a certain type, it has to communicate. So I bet that everybody's going to be using the starlink satellites to basically take and give them worldwide communication. So it's going to be some big infrastructure. Yeah. We probably should move on to our next topic here. Gus, you were going to, yeah, some. I can introduce the next topic and that it's pretty interesting. He has to do with AI, a lot of our subjects do, but open AI announced recently that they are, they're introducing chat GPT health and a lot of the healthcare apps that I think you guys are familiar with like Epic. Yeah. So I'll connect it and they're tapped into that. So at first glance, it seemed like super exciting news because it totally makes sense that you could reference AI has the ability to go instantly go through your medical records and personalize medical advice. Now we've all been going to Google for many years asking for medical advice and this seems like a big breakthrough. For that announcement, Google silently pulled out of the same area. They're backing off on their healthcare advice. They're not using AI to provide and it's funny that one company, huge one of the biggest companies on the planet is doubling down and the other huge company is pulling back. And I think it's going to be really interesting to see which approach works. Google feels that they are putting themselves in a libel situation by putting out false information. Yeah. And is the tie into the medical records? Is that enough to make it accurate enough and helpful to us referencing questions when we hear about something new to have our medical records tied into it? Seems like a great idea. If I had to pick a side, I'm on open AI. Yeah. I'm not clear on all of this right now. I know you've read more about it than I have, but Google backed out because they felt that the recommendations from AI were contradicting physicians or doctors multiple times. They ran into these contradictions and so they felt that it wasn't accurate enough. I don't know what level they're trying to get to. If they're trying to get to diagnosis level, yeah, I could see that's a problem because people are strange. Some people have strange things going on in their bodies that are very difficult to diagnose and it can be psychological mixed with real physical problems that they're having in their lives. And I just can't see how we can see AI actually diagnosing correctly every time. But the nice thing is that AI has access. If they have access to all of our records and our medications, they can help find conflicts. I'm telling you, your doctor who you go and see, let's say, when's the last time you went to your doctor, Gus, is it like every week? No, it's not every week. Is it every month? It's usually a couple of months. It's seldom every month, but maybe every two or three months. Can that doctor when he sees you? What's that? For us older folks. I went 15 years going to the doctor, maybe once every five, and to your point. Yeah, the doctor cannot be all knowledgeable about what's going on with your blood work and your the meds that you're taking now. And you go see multiple doctors, right? Because everybody's in a specialty silo. So having an AI that looks at it across the line to make sure you're not going to harm yourself with medicines from doctor A that doctor B didn't know about and vice versa. Or he doesn't find out for six or eight weeks. And then he says, what are you doing on this? And as you're allergic to that or if you're allergic to this med, you're also allergic to that med AI can bring all of that information together. And it can look at it as new things come in more rigorously than your physician. Now, nothing to bad about a physician, but he does not have all knowledge. He doesn't have, he may have access to your records on Epic. And that sort of thing, but he doesn't have it every time you make a visit. And or every day's going to hurt that much more efficiently and be able to correlate that. But what Google's admitting is that AI is not smart enough and might kill somebody. And they're back and off on that, which is terrifying, but at the same time, honest. Another point too. And that is that according to the AMA, the there's going to be a doctor shortage. Yeah. I think it's I don't know, 124,000 out of 24 by 2034. Again, giving the a little bit of credence to what the open AI's philosophy is. They're going to need some help. Yeah. And it's essentially if you look at these companies doing or not doing, it's a billion dollar bet on who can keep you alive versus who might accidentally kill you. Yeah. I chose to see who wins this one. I think though, there's some still really good uses for AI in in the medical field for things like guidance, like, for instance, you remember when they took the first picture of a retina and diagnosed this person had they had detached retina or had no diabetes. They had diabetes. It's an I call it diabetes, something or another, but I can't remember. But anyhow, it was diabetes related just by looking at the right now. So this is what AI is good at pattern matching, right? Better than a human being because if it has radiology, yeah, pattern, not saying before photos of things that it's seen x-rays that it's seen before. So if it has access to your information, retinal scan x-rays, those kinds of scans, it can tell it works much faster. Yeah. Yeah, probably. And they what do you call the output of a blood work? You call them, oh, I can't remember what they're called, but anyhow, the output of report of a blood work in match. Very quick. I call it bad news. Yeah, I call it bands of information. But this whole conversation though, it's not so much a technical one. You guys know I went to school for philosophy. I think it's more of a philosophical question. Interesting. It's quite that the two companies are taking Oh, philosophical. It goes a little bit deeper than just technical. Yeah. I know that I have taken and taken screenshots or camera shots of all of my medicines. And then on top of that, the supplements because who among us that gets to our age isn't doing supplements. There are some supplements that are highly reactive with your prescriptions. So you take a picture of all of those. And then mine says, Hey, did you know that you're taking like four medicines that have massive amounts of calcium and them or something? And so what it'll do is it'll take a picture of all of your supplements, all your vitamins that you're taking, Adam, all up and you know what it'll do. It will create one how they have that little what's in there and how much is in there of calcium potassium, et cetera, on the little back label. It recreates that from what you gave it. And it puts some sums them all together and it says, Hey, you're 8,000% too high on potassium here. It might be a problem. Yeah. That's a good example of where I actually value them all very valuable. I just hope they don't run away from it. I don't think they will. I think Dolan braze it more. And they'll find ways to make sure that AI is kept within certain constraints. That's the whole thing about everything we do is the last subject subject before that how to keep it controlled, how to keep it constrained. Keep it within a roll set that we can trust. And there's a danger in that financial information you would think would be the most valuable thing on the deep web. What's the most valuable thing? Medical information is more valuable on the dark web than financial information. And that's counterintuitive. I would rather have your bank count information than know what supplements you're taking. You think yeah, if I was a bag. They're selling it on there and they're getting more money for the medical records than they are. I heard that. Yeah. I think this is a fun one. I just heard the county. I don't know if it was Harrison County or whatever county here in Texas has just said that they are going to make it very difficult for you to get information online because they're being attacked by AI bots that are for like home values and things like that which you would think that's just normal information you want to be able to get to. But they're using that to apply for things within the county under these false fake entities. So they said look, we don't know who's real and who's not real anymore. So we're going to make it pretty difficult. Unfortunately, we said we have to do it to protect you and to protect us because our employees names are out there too. So they're just going to start making very difficult to get information. So those bots can't scant these public sites for that. So if there's a downside now of AI, right? Right? Right now it's being used by these bad actors to go after personal information so they can do fraud things like. So think about it guys. When we were kids, we'd call people up on the phone and say, hey, they have Prince Albert in the can. You better let them out. Is your refrigerator people can use whatever technology wrong? Do you know that companies in the early days of telephones would not put telephones on every person's desk? You know why? Because they were worried about poaching. So they didn't want phones to be on all their employees desk. Now it became ubiquitous. Right? So in the beginning of every new technology, there is some sort of advantage taking. And then after a while we deal with that to some degree. And during the early days, we have a lot of cyber problems with almost every new thing. So it doesn't matter whether it's classified ads in the early days of printing the radio TV telephones. There was people taking advantage in using that inappropriately at the beginning until we finally got a harness. So you can't just stop technology. You can't just stop focus. Now what we're going to talk about next as we transition into our next segment here, AI is no longer going to depend upon what it has pulled off of the web or pulled out of information databases. You know what it's going to do? It's asking itself questions to learn. So it's basically saying what should I know that I don't know? And then it's starting to ask additional questions. That's part and parcel to quantum advances, AI taking advantage of quantum. Has to be able to figure out like when I use AI, it's like, what is it that I don't know yet that I should know? So it's starting to be intelligent enough to ask itself questions to uncover things that none of us yet know. And that's where we're getting into a GI. We're getting into these AI models learning things because of their curiosity. And that's pretty interesting. What do you guys think about that? Yeah, I looked at Stanford's got a new species software that goes with AI and it's called their Curiosity Engine, Stanford Curiosity Engine. They broke down their system into a loop of understanding. So that's one of the detects uncertainty. So it defines areas where it's unsure or it's saying then it generates questions about that. And it asks itself targeted questions about the gaps in that information. Then it seeks for answers. And then it validate what it learned from those answers and then it updates the knowledge. So it's a pretty distinct process that it goes through and I can go into more detail, but we're not going to, we're not going to spend the time. Well, the interesting thing about that gym is that then the the training mechanism dramatically changes for training these models. And that's where all the expenses. That's where all the time spent. That's where all the money is. If it can, if AI can question itself and get better results, it's certainly going to be cheaper. But the question is, did AI just fire its own teachers? That's a good point. What we're talking about here is deductive logic, right? If this is true, then what do we know about that? And that deductive logic, I think, is what Stanford Curiosity engine is all about. It's been downloaded what? Over 100,000 times in its first month. That that engine is going to go bonkers. Nothing new. What's that? It's nothing. It's nothing new because if you think about it, look at how the member of the super computers learned how to play chess and they beat the champions and everything else. They did that by playing the game over and over. They would talk the rules just like him. Now we just teach AI the rules and then let them play the game over and over. It could be exciting. It could also be the next guy nut from the Terminator. Yeah, I think those first games that the computer was doing was really looking at pattern matches. It saw the board and it said, I've seen this before. If it's in this, in order to win, I need to change it to this pattern. After playing a million times. After playing the game a million times. But now I think we're now branching out to thinking on its own of all, how would a human think? What would a human think strategically? That's what they're trying to program into its thought engine is that how does a human rationalize and come to an answer? It could be very interesting as we go forward. I think it's cool. Think about a maze, right? Corn maze that you go through on Halloween or whatever. The maze has certain paths, right? A human has to trace those paths and a computer can trace those every permutation, every possible path to learn which ones are optimal, suboptimal, where there's blockers, where computers can do those sort of things, whereas it would take humans like months or years or weeks or what have you. Those sort of things are what AI can now do. It can look at all the possible permutations in medical, like we were just talking about. It can say, what have we gave them this drug? It says we did that 15 times over here and everybody died. That's probably not a good one. Probably better. That's a rabbit hole we don't want to go down. AI can go look at all these what ifs and determine the statistical failures and the statistical successes and then make determinations or use that research to help medical decisions and other such things. If you ask the questions, what if you take this supplement with that medicine and if it has all the diagnoses and all the tragedies that occurred and all the people who died, you can keep yourself from dying from stupid things, right? Yeah, like Russ was saying earlier, it's just a rule that can ask truth and stuff. You can discover vulnerability shortcuts and things like that. In the past, we gave it the guidelines, we gave it the knowledge and we gave it the confinement to where it was not able to go any further. We even checked its answers to make sure it's anger. That's the way AI has been trained at this point. But now they're going to say, no, you're going to go figure out what's the answer. And I might concern is check some balances about how do we know that it's got the right answer and you allowed it to write it to its information base. That's one. I'm sure they have some ideas on how to do that and are probably doing that. But here's what I have from a security perspective. Again, I always go back to security. AI can discover things that we didn't intend it to discover because we took away the guidelines. We took away the restrictions. And so now it finds a back door to get into something. It finds a vulnerability and it doesn't tell you about it. It finds unintended paths that could actually be used in a negative way. And yet maybe it doesn't have any negative intention, but it discovers it and it makes it available to humans. And humans are the ones that have the problem. Most likely to use something that's found or discovered that could be detrimental to society. I know that I'm just speaking. I mean, look at the benefit. Look at the benefits. The next AI breakthrough is upon us, right? It's not from feeding AI machines more data. It's coming from teaching the AI machines to ask better questions. And the question for you guys, when I looked into this topic, I saw a lot about open AI and in tropics. I didn't hear anything about Gora. Did you guys hear anything? Is Elon heading in this direction? He's obviously he's going open source, right? This next month. Right. And I don't know what his advantage is to that, but I think if he opens it up to open source, then instead of having the engineers working on the algorithms that he's hired and paid $500,000 a year too, he's going to get access to the rest of the world where everyone's going to be manipulating his variables and his training information and the algorithms. And he's going to get the benefit of the world's greatest thinkers without having to pay them. But you got to remember. And he was one of the original founders of open AI. He funded it and he always wanted open up AI to be open source for the world. Right. And so then. Then at open AI, goes private and starts making a for profit. And that pissed him off pretty much. And so you got to think that he's just returning back to the what he always intended AI to be is something that's beneficial to the world. And so that's where he's going. And you got to also understand he's got a lawsuit against open AI and he goes to court in March. So if the purpose of him is to go in and see open AI for the fact that they took an open and open source company that was supposed to be nonprofit and made it private and for profit. And in the lawsuit is that was never intended. And most of the money that start that company came from Elon Musk. So why wouldn't he also want to reiterate that in his own company that remains open source. Like I said, I think I think he's going to use it to his advantage because any open source project anyone people around the world can work on. The trouble is that you can't do that if you're privatized, you have to pay people to do all that work. You put an open source product out there and boom, Shaka Laka, you've got the whole world working on your algorithms. Pretty smart. And he's I think he's he's got it. Now the other thing is about Elon and his colossus too is that they have all those advanced chips. I don't think we've even their training on GROC 5 or GROC 6 or whatever now. And I think when he goes to release some of this stuff here pretty soon, he's just the silence before the storm. I think that's what we're looking at with about GROC. Interesting. And every one of these stories like I was saying earlier, it's not necessarily that the technology because we always have technology breakthroughs, things get better and better. The big story is who decides right who decides who governs who pairs the responsibility when these systems act in ways that they weren't exact programmed to do. Yeah, most of the big issues. Ultimately. Hey guys, it's been great getting together again for another week. Make sure and subscribe, comment. Thank you so much for joining us everybody. We'll see you again next week. Thank you for flying with us and have a pleasant day.